| Author |
Message |
    
Dick Haight
| | Posted on Thursday, June 08, 2000 - 7:28 pm: |   |
Sounds nice. I'd pay $35 for a Macintosh version. |
Karel de Grote
| | Posted on Friday, June 16, 2000 - 11:16 am: | |
I agree with dick
I'd pay $35 for a Macintosh
version. |
Tony Blunt
| | Posted on Sunday, June 25, 2000 - 9:39 pm: | |
When will the Mac version be available? |
John Strait
| | Posted on Thursday, July 13, 2000 - 7:55 am: | |
I'm sorry, but I don't have any plans for a Macintosh version. My time and resources are limited. The shareware registration rate just can't support a major new development effort like a port to Macintosh, so I've had to concentrate on the PC version. |
hepler
| | Posted on Thursday, July 27, 2000 - 5:18 pm: | |
I would really like a mac version and it would be
worth more than the $35 pc version. say $100
come on mac useres give John some motovaion to get
back to work
than |
Micha Schnitzler
| | Posted on Wednesday, August 02, 2000 - 8:31 am: | |
Dear John,
I'd really like to have an Mac version of your great tool. Please do invest a likkel time for us Mac-user.
Big up Micha Schnitzler, Germany |
Nicolas Arrouet
| | Posted on Friday, October 20, 2000 - 9:50 am: | |
Yes ! :) |
zakkpakk
| | Posted on Thursday, November 02, 2000 - 9:49 am: | |
as i write at the guestbook: mac version would be more then "life-time"-saver for me. and if i was stupid enough to pay for (apple authoring studio and panoworx 299 for each) two - should say less professional: at least stitching images - programs the same amount of money worth for me. |
ch. hasspacher
| | Posted on Monday, October 29, 2001 - 7:01 am: | |
me too, I'd be very happy about a mac version and would buy it, so let me know about your plans ... |
Bonnie Shedd
| | Posted on Tuesday, November 06, 2001 - 7:41 am: | |
How about a Mac program? Windows is for solitare -- Mac is for productivity.
Most of us Mac folks are heavy into graphics -- c'mon give us a break! |
R H
| | Posted on Sunday, January 20, 2002 - 12:28 pm: | |
Yes, I'd really appreciate a Mac version too. First time
I booted my G4 I smiled to myself and thought: Wow!
yes, this is a REAL computer!
I guess I'm not alone. |
Tim
| | Posted on Friday, February 15, 2002 - 9:14 am: | |
The performance won't be wonderful but you can run TPF using Connectix Virtual PC on your Mac |
daniel
| | Posted on Monday, February 25, 2002 - 10:41 pm: | |
Tim, can you confirm that VPC works, what
versions of TPF and VPC were you using ?
and John, I would definitely pay real money for
a MAC version, please,please,pretty please!
daniel. |
Allan Jamieson
| | Posted on Sunday, April 28, 2002 - 1:45 pm: | |
Ditto!
I'd agree with the above, your software looks
really good and is certainly something that I
would buy if it were available for the Mac. Only
thing is, you'd need to make it in the new OS X
software that Apple have introduced.
Your prices are far too low by the way, Mac
users would pay more than that for something
this useful. |
Roger Hsu
| | Posted on Monday, July 15, 2002 - 12:33 pm: | |
I would definitely pay for a Mac version of this product. I have tried several panorama products, both for the PC and Mac and can say that this is by far the best one.
Please create a Mac OS X version! |
Hervé
| | Posted on Friday, August 09, 2002 - 7:14 am: | |
If you are not willing to create a native MacOS
X version, please make at least a Xwindow
one, which can be used both on MacOS X and
Linux.
Thanks in advance. |
mike
| | Posted on Thursday, September 26, 2002 - 8:51 pm: | |
TPF runs on OSX 10.2.1 under virtual PC, although it is a bit slow (I can't tell if that is a result of the 10 MB 16 bit Tiff files I'm starting with, or if it is simply slow). The initial results are, however, amazing. |
Stefan Haehnsen
| | Posted on Wednesday, April 23, 2003 - 5:03 pm: | |
I would say that many people working on graphics and PHOTOS still seem to use a Macintosh, so please give it to us (imean the panorama factory ;-).
Most of us are people that are used to spend money on our working-tools. |
Brock
| | Posted on Friday, July 04, 2003 - 7:26 pm: | |
Now that the G5 is coming.... please make a Mac version
Will pay more than the $35 times 3 |
Husk
| | Posted on Thursday, July 17, 2003 - 2:17 pm: | |
Well I'm looking at spending $60 for StitcherEZ since it is
an OSX version. I haven't compared it against Panorama yet
but it looks like a possibility. And yes I would like to see
Panorama Factory ported to OSX especially since it looks
like the G5 kicks. |
John Strait
Moderator
Username: Jstrait
Post Number: 331
Registered: 5-2001
| | Posted on Wednesday, October 17, 2007 - 1:33 pm: | |
The Mac version of The Panorama Factory was released, finally, on October 12, 2007! |
